Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for IDFFDVW, serial 98198121, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IDFFDVW
Serial 98198121 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination

Owner: Minghui, Zhang
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Sep 26, 2023

The record shows a live, pending application on the Principal Register owned by Minghui Zhang, filed on September 26 2023 and currently marked “Non‑final Office action mailed” on August 26 2026, which is the most recent status event. The application covers a range of electronic and scientific apparatus in International Class 009, specifically earphones, microphones, smartwatches, telescopes, vidicons, webcams, computer chassis, document printers, Ethernet repeaters, flight simulators, network routers, overhead projectors, radio relay cables, thermal printers and wireless routers, with a stated first use in commerce on July 19 2023. Because the claim is limited to those goods, a similar name used for unrelated products would be farther from the scope shown here, but a name used for any of the listed items could raise a record‑based concern. The prosecution history shows the application was assigned to an examiner and a non‑final action was issued in August 2026, but there is no indication of any opposition, cancellation or court action, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for comparable electronic devices.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search