Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGON BALL DAIMA, serial 98211847, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGON BALL DAIMASerial 98211847 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Oct 06, 2023
The record shows a live pending application for “DRAGON BALL DAIMA” owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha, filed on Oct 06 2023 and currently under examination on the Principal Register; the most recent activity is the USPTO’s notice on Sep 04 2026 that a third extension of time to file a Statement of Use was granted. The application lists a broad slate of goods and services, from computer game software, video‑game consoles and downloadable content (class 009) to board and card games, plush toys and action figures (class 028), as well as entertainment‑related services such as e‑sports competitions and production of television shows (class 041). A similar name used in any of those areas would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Dragon Ball Daima.” No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark in the same gaming or entertainment fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.