Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGONBALL Z, serial 98261037, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGONBALL ZSerial 98261037 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha
Class 008 -
Class 018 -
Class 024 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Nov 08, 2023
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark DRAGONBALL Z owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha, filed on Nov 8 2023 and currently under examination on the Principal Register. The goods listed span class 008 (tableware such as forks, knives and spoons), class 018 (leather items, trunks, bags, umbrellas and wallets), class 024 (textile fabrics, bed and household linens, blankets) and class 030 (a range of foods and beverages including cakes, candy, coffee drinks, frozen‑yogurt drinks, chocolate, snack foods and ice cream). A similar name used on products that fall into any of those categories would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those areas are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “DRAGONBALL Z.” The prosecution history shows that after a non‑final office action in June 2024, the applicant received a Notice of Allowance in December 2024 and has been granted three successive extensions of time to file a Statement of Use, the most recent approval being emailed on June 5 2026. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar goods under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.