Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FORTNITE FESTIVAL, serial 98295261, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FORTNITE FESTIVALSerial 98295261 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Epic Games, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 01, 2023
The record shows that “FORTNITE FESTIVAL” is a pending trademark owned by Epic Games, Inc., a corporation organized in Maryland, and it is currently under examination on the Principal Register. The mark covers a wide range of downloadable and online computer and video game software and services that feature music, karaoke, dance, rhythm games, and related virtual or augmented reality experiences, as well as online entertainment services that provide non‑downloadable music for gameplay and interactive virtual environments. Because the goods and services are specifically tied to music‑based gaming and online entertainment, a similar name used in those same contexts would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Epic Games control over every use of the wording, especially outside the listed classes. The prosecution history shows that the applicant has repeatedly requested and received extensions to file a Statement of Use, with the most recent extension granted on January 27, 2026. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement signal. If you are thinking of using a similar name in music‑based gaming or related online entertainment, this record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.