Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NO PERMISSION NEEDED ART ORIGINAL FINE ART BY M. GASBY BROWN A DIVISION OF THE GASBY GROUP, serial 98299133, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NO PERMISSION NEEDED ART ORIGINAL FINE ART BY M. GASBY BROWN A DIVISION OF THE GASBY GROUPSerial 98299133 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Brown, Margaret Gasby
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Dec 05, 2023
Registered Sep 02, 2025
The record shows that the mark “NO PERMISSION NEEDED ART ORIGINAL FINE ART BY M. GASBY BROWN A DIVISION OF THE GASBY GROUP” is live and registered on the Principal Register as of September 2, 2025, owned by Margaret Gasby Brown, an individual. The registration covers a broad array of paper goods and printed matter, including art etchings, prints, photographs, and framed art in class 016. A similar name used for comparable paper‑based art products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while use in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a standard examination sequence with a notice of allowance and statement of use, culminating in registration; no supplemental register steps are involved. The latest event is the registration confirmation on September 2, 2025, with no further maintenance dates provided. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record indicates a meaningful risk of conflict if the name is used for similar paper‑based art goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.