Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS SUPERVOOC, serial 98368971, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS SUPERVOOC
Serial 98368971 · Principal Register
Live · Registered

Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jan 22, 2024
Registered Jul 08, 2025

The record shows that ONEPLUS SUPERVOOC is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China, and it was registered on July 8 2025 after filing on January 22 2024. The registration covers Class 009 goods described as “power adapters for smartphone; smartphone battery chargers; USB chargers adapted for car cigarette lighter sockets,” so a similar name used on any of those charging accessories would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words ONEPLUS or SUPERVOOC in unrelated product categories. The prosecution history shows a normal examination path with a non‑final office action in August 2024, a response, and eventual approval for publication and registration on the Principal Register, without any supplemental‑register steps. The most recent status event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on July 8 2025, and the supplied history contains no visible oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand charging hardware with a similar name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search