Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RWJF ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION, serial 98402545, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RWJF ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATIONSerial 98402545 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 12, 2024
Registered Apr 07, 2026
The record shows a live, registered Principal Register service mark owned by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a New Jersey non‑profit corporation, and it covers charitable foundation and educational activities in classes 035, 036, 041 and 042 – specifically public‑awareness promotion, grantmaking, health‑related research, conferences, online newsletters and a grant‑search website. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those health‑focused charitable, educational or grant‑related services, because the listed goods and services are fairly broad within that sector. The record does not give the foundation control over every possible use of the words “Robert Wood Johnson” or “Foundation” in unrelated fields. The most recent meaningful event is the Notice of Registration Confirmation and entry on the Principal Register dated April 7 2026; no future deadline appears in the data. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a health‑oriented charitable or educational brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.