Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROBERT IRVINE'S PUBLIC HOUSE, serial 98428792, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROBERT IRVINE'S PUBLIC HOUSESerial 98428792 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Irvine Holdings, LLC
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Mar 01, 2024
The record shows that “ROBERT IRVINE'S PUBLIC HOUSE” is no longer active – it was abandoned on July 20 2026 because the required Statement of Use was never filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Irvine Holdings, LLC, a Florida limited‑liability company. The registration, had it survived, covered only “Restaurant and bar services” in International Class 043, so the closest area of concern for a similar name would be other businesses that provide food‑service or drinking‑establishment services. The record does not give the owner any blanket control over the words “Robert Irvine” or “Public House” in unrelated fields. This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply reflects the standard steps of amendment, notice of allowance and the eventual abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on July 20 2026, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a comparable name for a restaurant or bar, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked the wording to that type of service.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.