Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PENTAL SURFACES, serial 98467008, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PENTAL SURFACESSerial 98467008 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Architectural Surfaces Group, LLC
Class 017 -
Class 019 -
Class 021 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 25, 2024
The record shows that “PENTAL SURFACES” is a pending trademark on the Principal Register owned by Architectural Surfaces Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The mark covers a range of non‑metal building materials—PVC bars, blocks, pellets, rods, sheets and tubes, as well as hardwood, ceramic, porcelain, quartz, granite, stone, sintered stone, glass, and other surfaces used for building tiles, flooring panels, countertops, backsplashes, shower walls, bathroom vanities, and fireplace surrounds. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same construction‑materials and building‑surface categories, especially where the goods are used for further manufacture of tiles or flooring. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the listed goods. The prosecution history shows a standard examination with a notice of allowance and several extensions of time to file a Statement of Use, but no opposition or cancellation events appear. The latest status event is the grant of a third extension on July 21, 2026. With no enforcement activity recorded, the supplied history shows no visible enforcement signals. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of similarity in the construction‑material and building‑surface markets.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.