Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for CLOSE-UNIPOLAR, serial 98540033, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CLOSE-UNIPOLAR
Serial 98540033 · Principal Register
Live · Registered

Owner: Affera, Inc
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 08, 2024
Registered Jul 21, 2026

The record shows that CLOSE‑UNIPOLAR is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by Affera, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and it was officially registered on July 21 2026. The protection is limited to Class 009 goods described as downloadable and recorded computer software and mobile device software used to operate, control and manage surgical devices and ablation systems, to plan, map, navigate and perform surgical and medical procedures, and specifically a computer algorithm that collects intracardiac data. A similar name used for software or digital tools in the surgical or medical device field would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated industries would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give Affera control over every possible use of the words “CLOSE‑UNIPOLAR.” The latest meaningful event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on July 21 2026; no further dates are listed. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market software for surgical or medical procedures under a similar name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search