Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LET IT RAIN, serial 98544084, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LET IT RAINSerial 98544084 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: RAIN Scientific, Inc.
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 010 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 10, 2024
The record shows that “LET IT RAIN” is a dead, abandoned application filed by RAIN Scientific, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, under an intent‑to‑use basis. The mark was published for opposition on November 26, 2024, received a Notice of Allowance on January 7, 2025, and was abandoned on February 9, 2026 because the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension request. The goods and services listed cover pharmaceuticals, medical devices for treating infections, educational services about health and pharmaceuticals, and scientific research services focused on antimicrobial resistance. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these health‑related categories, especially where the mark is used for pharmaceutical preparations or related educational content. The record does not give control over all uses of the wording, only the specific goods and services listed. No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The practical risk for someone considering a similar name is that use in the listed health and science areas could trigger a claim of infringement, while use in unrelated fields may be less problematic.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.