Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MSI, serial 98576406, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MSISerial 98576406 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: The Baldwin Insurance Group Holdings, LLC
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 30, 2024
The record shows that the mark “MSI” is currently pending and has been published for opposition on July 7, 2026. The owner is The Baldwin Insurance Group Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The mark covers a wide range of insurance and financial services in class 036, including homeowners, flood, renters, commercial cyber, environmental liability, and other property and liability policies, as well as insurance claims administration and brokerage services. It also covers class 042 services, namely providing an online, non‑downloadable software platform for insurance agents, brokers, and underwriters to distribute, manage, and administer insurance products. Because the goods and services are specifically insurance‑related, a similar name used in that same industry would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give control over every use of the wording, only over the listed services. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication on June 10, 2026 and then published for opposition; no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The next consequential date would be the end of the opposition period, but that date is not provided. For someone considering a similar name in insurance or related software services, this record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.