Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for PAIPERCAL, serial 98587487, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAIPERCAL
Serial 98587487 · Principal Register
Live · Registered

Owner: Wenyong Li
Class 024 -
Filed Jun 06, 2024
Registered Mar 11, 2025

The record shows that PAIPERCAL is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register, owned by Wenyong Li, an individual. The mark protects a range of textile goods—quilts, bath linens, kitchen linens, tablecloths, banners, flags, and other fabric‑based items—first used in commerce on March 10, 2024. A similar name would raise the closest concern for those same textile products, especially items like towels, linens, and banners. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it applies only to the goods listed. The prosecution history shows a straightforward path: the application was filed on June 6, 2024, published for opposition on January 21, 2025, and registered on March 11, 2025, with no opposition or enforcement actions recorded. The latest event is the registration confirmation on March 11, 2025. Because no enforcement activity appears in the supplied history, the owner has not yet demonstrated any aggressive protection. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that using PAIPERCAL for textile goods could lead to infringement concerns, while use in unrelated categories would be less problematic.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search