Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RYZE MATCHA, serial 98621522, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RYZE MATCHASerial 98621522 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Li, Zhi
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Jun 27, 2024
The record shows that RYZE MATCHA, owned by individual Li Zhi, is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to answer an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated April 30 2025. The filing covered Class 005 pharmaceutical goods, specifically caffeine preparations for stimulative use and a range of dietary‑supplement powders and drink mixes, all tied to the first commercial use on April 25 2024. Because the claim is limited to those supplement and nutraceutical products, a similar name used for unrelated categories such as apparel, software or services would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Ryze” or “Matcha.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on April 30 2025, and the prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a supplement brand with a comparable name, since the abandoned filing still signals a prior claim in that product space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.