Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FORSYTHE LUBRICATION, serial 98622704, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FORSYTHE LUBRICATIONSerial 98622704 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Forsythe Lubrication Associates Limited
Class 001 -
Class 002 -
Class 004 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 037 -
Class 040 -
Filed Jun 27, 2024
The record shows that the mark “FORSYTHE LUBRICATION” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an office action. The owner listed is Forsythe Lubrication Associates Limited, a corporation organized in Canada. The abandoned application covered a wide range of lubricants and related services, including automotive and industrial oils, greases, and technical advice on lubricant manufacture, as well as retail and wholesale store services for lubricants. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these specific lubricant goods and services, especially where the name is used for automotive or industrial lubrication products or related retail services. The record does not give control over every use of the word “lubrication.” The prosecution history shows a standard refusal and subsequent abandonment, with no indication that the mark was ever moved to the Supplemental Register. The latest status event is the abandonment notice on June 24, 2025. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned mark suggests a potential risk of confusion in the lubricant market, but it does not preclude all uses of the term.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.