Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JULIUS KOCH, serial 98623517, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JULIUS KOCHSerial 98623517 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Julius Koch GmbH
Class 006 -
Class 022 -
Class 023 -
Class 026 -
Filed Jun 27, 2024
The record shows that “JULIUS KOCH” is a pending mark on the Principal Register owned by Julius Koch GmbH, a limited liability company organized in Germany. The mark covers building materials such as metal awnings and a wide range of textile products, including tarpaulins, tents, and various textile screens, as well as yarns, threads, and hair nets. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of metal awnings, textile tarpaulins, and related outdoor coverings. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods listed. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication, received a Notice of Allowance, and the applicant has requested and been granted an extension to file a Statement of Use. No opposition, cancellation, or enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the current pending status and the specific goods listed suggest a meaningful risk of conflict in those product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.