Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AIOT, serial 98637431, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AIOTSerial 98637431 · Supplemental Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 021 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jul 08, 2024
Registered Jan 13, 2026
The record shows that the mark “AIOT” is live and registered on the Supplemental Register, owned by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha, a corporation organized in Japan. The mark covers a wide range of electrical appliances and electronic devices, including electric vacuum cleaners, dishwashers, juicers, food processors, robots, security surveillance robots, smartphones, tablets, and related software for controlling household appliances. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these areas of household and industrial electrical equipment, robotics, and related digital services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a descriptiveness refusal, an amendment, and eventual approval for registration on the Supplemental Register, indicating the mark was not deemed distinctive enough for the Principal Register. The latest event is the registration on January 13, 2026, with no enforcement actions recorded. If you plan to use a similar name in any of these categories, proceed with caution.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.