Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CLOSE PROTECTION OFFICER, serial 98644664, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CLOSE PROTECTION OFFICERSerial 98644664 · Principal Register
Pending · Awaiting Examination
Owner: Board of Executive Protection Professionals
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jul 11, 2024
The record shows a live pending application for the mark CLOSE PROTECTION OFFICER, filed by the Board of Executive Protection Professionals, a Nevada‑organized non‑profit corporation, and it is currently awaiting examination on the Principal Register. The goods and services listed are “provision of protection for executives being security services” in International Class 045, so a similar name used for executive‑security or personal‑protection services would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “close protection officer.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply notes the application entry on July 12 2024 and a correspondence change on September 27 2024, with no enforcement actions recorded. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same security‑service space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.