Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RYZE SHROOM, serial 98661295, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RYZE SHROOMSerial 98661295 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Atang Wang
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Jul 23, 2024
The record shows that the application for RYZE SHROOM (Serial 98661295) is dead, having been abandoned on June 24, 2025 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Atang Wang, an individual. The goods are limited to class 005 pharmaceuticals, specifically dietary and nutritional supplements, fiber for digestion, supplement drink mixes, probiotic compositions, vitamin and mineral supplements, and medicinal herb extracts that are not essential oils. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those supplement or nutraceutical products, since the record’s protection is confined to that description and does not extend to unrelated goods or services. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice and subsequent abandonment entry on June 24, 2025; no further maintenance or renewal dates are provided. The prosecution history shows only the office‑action correspondence and the final abandonment, with no oppositions, cancellations, or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar dietary supplements under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.