Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BLOOMING ADVISORS, serial 98663684, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BLOOMING ADVISORSSerial 98663684 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Shah, Chirag
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 24, 2024
The record shows that the mark “BLOOMING ADVISORS” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Chirag Shah, an individual. The mark was filed as a service mark on July 24 2024 and covers a wide range of information‑technology and consulting services in class 042, such as application hosting, software development, IT consulting, and innovation consulting. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same field of technology and consulting services. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific services listed. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of Office actions and a final abandonment notice, with no evidence of enforcement activity. The latest event is the abandonment notice on May 21 2025. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means there is no active claim, but the same services could still trigger a concern if the name is used in that narrow field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.