Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HAPPY VALUE, serial 98664210, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HAPPY VALUESerial 98664210 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: MICHAELS STORES PROCUREMENT COMPANY, INC.
Class 002 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 017 -
Class 018 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 022 -
Class 023 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Jul 24, 2024
The record shows that the mark “HAPPY VALUE” was filed by Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc. on July 24, 2024 and was abandoned after publication on March 13, 2026, so it is no longer live or registered. The abandoned application covered a wide range of fine‑art supplies, cosmetics, candles, sewing and crafting tools, jewelry, paper goods, bags, clothing, and staple foods, all listed under various classes. Because the mark was abandoned, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but the closest concern would arise for any new use that falls within those same goods or services—especially in the arts and crafts or jewelry categories. The prosecution history shows no opposition or enforcement actions, and the supplied history contains no visible enforcement signals. The latest status event was the abandonment on March 13, 2026. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk only if the new use is in the same or a closely related category of goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.