Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE MARK CONSISTS OF THE STYLIZED TEXT "TWEETY.AI" IN LOWERCASE LETTERS. THE WORD "TWEETY" IS IN BOLD FONT, WHILE ".AI" IS IN A SLIGHTLY LIGHTER FONT, EMPHASIZING THE TECHNOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOCUS OF THE BRAND. THE TEXT IS DISPLAYED IN A MODERN, SANS-SERIF TYPEFACE THAT CONVEYS A SLEEK AND CONTEMPORARY LOOK. THE MARK DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY SPECIFIC COLOR OR DESIGN ELEMENTS, ALLOWING FOR FLEXIBILITY IN ITS USE ACROSS VARIOUS DIGITAL AND PHYSICAL MEDIA., serial 98722375, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 98722375 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bolouri, Ramin S
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 28, 2024
The record shows that the mark “tweety.ai” is a dead application that was refused because it did not meet minimum filing date requirements; the serial number 98722375 was assigned in error. The owner listed is Ramin S. Bolouri, a Delaware limited liability company. The application covered services in class 038—telecommunication services such as voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video transmission—and class 042—software as a service that uses artificial intelligence for customer service, sales, logistics, and communication management. Because the mark is not registered, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording “tweety.ai.” The prosecution history shows only the initial filing on August 28, 2024, with no further examination or amendment. No oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be in the same telecommunications and AI‑based software services, but the dead status means the owner has no active claim to enforce.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.