Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PURPLE, serial 98786050, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PURPLESerial 98786050 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: PURPLE WIFI LIMITED
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 04, 2024
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark PURPLE filed by PURPLE WIFI LIMITED, a UK limited company, and it is being examined on the Principal Register. The goods and services listed fall in International Classes 009 (downloadable software for wireless network management, data analytics, CRM and business intelligence), 035 (market‑research and data‑collection services for visitors in retail, hospitality, entertainment and public venues), 038 (telecommunications consulting and management of wireless internet access) and 042 (technology consulting, SaaS and digital‑transformation services related to wireless access and customer‑data analytics). A similar name used in any of those technology‑oriented fields would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those areas are farther from the scope shown here. The latest meaningful event is the non‑final Office action mailed on Aug 27 2026, which means the USPTO is still requesting a response. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the history, so the supplied record shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same software‑or‑telecom space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.