Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for F GRUPPO FLAEM, serial 98803331, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
F GRUPPO FLAEMSerial 98803331 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: FLAEM NUOVA S.p.A.
Class 007 -
Class 010 -
Class 011 -
Filed Oct 15, 2024
Registered Sep 30, 2025
The record shows that “F GRUPPO FLAEM” is a live Principal Register trademark owned by FLAEM NUOVA S.p.A., a società per azioni organized in Italy, and it was officially registered on September 30 2025 after publication for opposition on August 12 2025. The protection covers three classes: Class 007 for food‑and‑beverage processing and vacuum‑sealing machines and related packaging equipment; Class 010 for a broad range of medical and veterinary respiratory‑therapy devices, obstetric forceps, fumigation and massage apparatus, nursing appliances such as breast pumps, diagnostic and esthetic massage equipment, sphygmomanometers and related measuring tools; and Class 011 for heating, ventilation, air‑purification and related electric appliances, including humidifiers, bottle warmers, sterilizers, electric cooking pans and chemically‑activated hand‑warmers. A similar name used in any of those specific product areas would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the listed scope but not automatically free of risk. The latest meaningful event is the registration confirmation on September 30 2025, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that overlaps these classes.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.