Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROBERT DUVALL, serial 98821422, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROBERT DUVALLSerial 98821422 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Duvall, Robert
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Oct 25, 2024
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark ROBERT DUVALL owned by Robert Duvall, filed on Oct 25 2024 and currently under examination on the Principal Register; the most recent activity is the notice on Jul 23 2026 approving a second extension of time to file a Statement of Use. The application covers meat (class 029), spices and spice blends (class 030), soft‑drink and carbonated non‑alcoholic beverages (class 032), and services such as arranging art exhibitions, providing entertainment information via a website, and publishing books (class 041). A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those foods, drinks, or entertainment‑related services, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Robert Duvall.” The prosecution history shows an initial final refusal in Apr 2025, followed by a notice of allowance in Jul 2025 and two granted extensions for filing a use statement, indicating the USPTO has moved the application forward but has not yet issued a registration. No oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market meat, spices, soft drinks, or related entertainment services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.