Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JULIUS AI, serial 98821495, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JULIUS AISerial 98821495 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Caesar Labs Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 25, 2024
Registered Feb 17, 2026
The record shows that “JULIUS AI” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register owned by Caesar Labs Inc., a Delaware corporation. The mark protects downloadable computer software that uses artificial intelligence for text generation, conversation simulation, data processing, image generation, and related services, as well as online non‑downloadable software and SaaS services in the same AI‑driven categories. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same AI‑software and SaaS fields, especially where the software is offered for download or as a service. The record does not give control over every use of the words “Julius” or “AI” outside those specific goods and services. The prosecution history shows a straightforward examination that led to registration on February 17, 2026, with no opposition or enforcement actions recorded. The latest status event is the registration confirmation on that date. For anyone looking to use a similar name, the risk is that the mark’s scope covers AI‑software and related services, so use in those areas would likely trigger a concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.