Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NEURORADIANT WHERE NEURODIVERGENCE AND HUMBLE FAITH COLLIDE, serial 98867213, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEURORADIANT WHERE NEURODIVERGENCE AND HUMBLE FAITH COLLIDESerial 98867213 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Emily Flowers
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Nov 22, 2024
The record shows that the mark “NEURORADIANT WHERE NEURODIVERGENCE AND HUMBLE FAITH COLLIDE” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant, Emily Flowers, failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on November 22, 2024 and the abandonment notice was issued on November 13, 2025. It was a service mark on the Principal Register, covering online journals and blogs for Christians with developmental and psychiatric disabilities in class 041. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but the specific description of Christian blogs for people with developmental and psychiatric disabilities is the closest area of concern. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of office actions and a final abandonment, with no evidence of opposition, cancellation, or court action. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk would be potential confusion in the niche of Christian blogs for developmental and psychiatric disabilities, though the mark itself is no longer enforceable.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.