Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for THAT GPT GIRL, serial 98916613, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THAT GPT GIRL
Serial 98916613 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Karissa Kist
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 21, 2024

The record shows that the mark “THAT GPT GIRL” was abandoned after a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and the owner listed is Karissa Kist, an individual. The abandoned application covered downloadable electronic publications, clothing items, audio and video content, and educational services all focused on artificial intelligence, generative AI tools, and prompt engineering. Because the mark was never registered, it does not give the owner exclusive control over the wording in any context. The abandonment means there is no active enforcement activity recorded, and the supplied history shows no oppositions or cancellations beyond the TTAB decision. The latest meaningful event was the abandonment on January 29, 2026. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be in the same AI‑focused digital content and educational services, but the lack of a current registration suggests that the risk of direct conflict is lower, though the wording could still be problematic if used in closely related areas.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search