Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CLOSE ACCESS DENIAL, serial 98922779, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CLOSE ACCESS DENIALSerial 98922779 · Supplemental Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Nzyme LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 26, 2024
Registered Nov 11, 2025
The record shows that “CLOSE ACCESS DENIAL” is a live Supplemental Register service mark owned by Nzyme LLC, a Texas limited‑liability company, and it was registered on Nov 11 2025 after a series of office‑action responses and a use amendment that moved the application to the Supplemental Register. The registration covers scientific and technology services in class 042, specifically computer software development for open‑source cybersecurity, network‑monitoring and data‑analysis software, SaaS cybersecurity services, and technical support for software problems; a similar name used in those same kinds of cybersecurity or network‑monitoring services would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give Nzyme LLC control over every possible use of the words “CLOSE ACCESS DENIAL,” especially outside the listed tech services. The latest meaningful event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on Nov 11 2025, and no enforcement actions or oppositions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same cybersecurity software space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.