Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENAI, serial 99025123, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENAISerial 99025123 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: OPENAI FOUNDATION
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jan 31, 2025
The record shows that the mark “OPENAI” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by OPENAI FOUNDATION, a Delaware corporation. The application, filed January 31 2025, lists a wide array of goods and services in classes 009, 035, 038, 041, 042, and 045, covering software, advertising, communication, education, scientific services, and online networking. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these classes, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed software, AI‑related education, or online communication services. The record does not grant control over every use of the word “OPENAI”; it only reflects the specific classes and descriptions shown. The prosecution history is empty, so no opposition or cancellation events are visible. The latest status update is the August 14 2026 entry noting that the applicant’s response to a non‑final Office action has been entered and the application is back for further review. With no enforcement activity recorded, the supplied history shows no visible enforcement signals. For someone considering a similar name, the pending status and broad class coverage suggest a meaningful risk of conflict in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.