Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for U M I, serial 99031530, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
U M ISerial 99031530 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: PANASONIC WELL LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Feb 06, 2025
The record shows the mark U M I is dead – it was abandoned on Feb 10 2026 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final Office action, and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice that day. The owner listed is Panasonic Well LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company. The application covered a range of services and software in classes 009, 038, 042 and 044, all focused on health, wellness, parenting, family management and related digital content, such as computer‑application software for mobile devices, peer‑to‑peer data sharing, online community hosting, and a website providing information and advice in those areas. A similar name used for products or services outside those health‑and‑family‑focused digital realms would be farther from the scope shown here, but the record does not give Panasonic Well LLC control over every possible use of the letters “U M I.” The prosecution history shows the application was filed on Feb 6 2025, received an extension to respond, then received a non‑final action in July 2025 before being abandoned; no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a name in the same health‑and‑family digital space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.