Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS GLAMOROUS INTERNATIONAL, serial 99033551, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS GLAMOROUS INTERNATIONALSerial 99033551 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Marlen Gallo
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Feb 07, 2025
The record shows that “MISS GLAMOROUS INTERNATIONAL” is an abandoned application; the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to answer a final refusal, with the abandonment notice dated January 6 2026 and the owner listed as Marlen Gallo, an individual. The filing covered services in three classes: Class 035 advertising, marketing and sponsorship‑search services for talent and fashion contests; Class 041 organizing and conducting modeling and fashion events, plus educational mentoring and consulting in modeling, public speaking and personal development; and Class 045 personal‑image consulting, online membership‑club content on self‑improvement and interpersonal communication. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these areas, especially any fashion‑related event or consulting services, because the record’s goods and services are narrowly defined to those fields. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Miss Glamorous” or “International.” No enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable fashion‑event or image‑consulting services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.