Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONE+, serial 99049262, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONE+Serial 99049262 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Techtronic Cordless GP
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Filed Feb 20, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark ONE+ owned by Techtronic Cordless GP, a Nevada partnership, and it is being pursued on the Principal Register. The goods listed span several classes – class 007 includes power‑operated cultivators, sprayers, electric tools and floor‑cleaning machines; class 009 covers personal stereos, audio speakers and solar‑powered battery chargers; class 011 lists spotlights, LED worklights and electric fans; class 012 is limited to tire inflators; class 020 covers non‑metal garage organizers; and class 021 includes electric insect‑killing devices. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those types of equipment or accessories, because the record’s protection is tied to those specific descriptions, not to every possible use of the word “ONE+.” The prosecution history shows a final refusal in December 2025, an examiner’s amendment in March 2024 that led to approval for publication, and a Notice of Allowance issued on May 26 2026 – the most recent meaningful status event. The applicant now has six months from that date to file a Statement of Use or request an extension; no opposition, cancellation or court activity appears in the supplied history. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar power tools or related electrical devices under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.