Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HAPPY WIFE, serial 99071001, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HAPPY WIFESerial 99071001 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Ghost Global LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Mar 06, 2025
The record shows that the mark “HAPPY WIFE” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant, Ghost Global LLC, failed to respond to an office action. The mark was filed on March 6, 2025, and the abandonment was noted on September 2, 2025. The goods listed are clothing items such as hats, pants, shorts, socks, sneakers, underwear, t‑shirts, sweatshirts, and hooded sweatshirts, all under class 025. Because the mark is no longer active, the owner no longer holds exclusive rights to those specific goods, but the record still indicates that the wording was once considered distinctive for that apparel line. The prosecution history shows a straightforward sequence of filing, assignment to an examiner, a non‑final action, and eventual abandonment, with no supplemental register steps. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone looking to use a similar name on apparel, the closest concern is the abandoned mark’s apparel scope; the record does not show that the owner controls the wording beyond that specific class, but the past filing suggests some prior intent to protect it.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.