Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELEANOR ROSE, serial 99077230, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELEANOR ROSESerial 99077230 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: John Swierczewski
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 11, 2025
The record shows the mark ELEANOR ROSE is abandoned, with the last status date of Dec 08 2025, and the owner listed as John Swierczewski, an individual who filed an intent‑to‑use application on Mar 11 2025. The goods and services covered span three classes: Class 009 for downloadable fiction books and short stories, Class 016 for printed fiction books, story books and printed short‑story series, and Class 035 for an on‑line retail store offering books, stationery, toys, clothing and drinkware. A similar name used for any of those types of books, digital or printed, or for an online store selling comparable items would be the closest record‑based concern, because the record’s protection is limited to those described categories. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Eleanor Rose” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a non‑final office action in August 2025 and an abandonment notice in December 2025, after which the application was abandoned for failure to respond. No enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the name for books or related retail services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.