Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PRACTICE GPT, serial 99102162, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PRACTICE GPTSerial 99102162 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Prahsys Inc.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 25, 2025
The record shows that the mark “PRACTICE GPT” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant, Prahsys Inc., failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed as a service mark on March 25 2025 and was listed on the Principal Register. It covered a wide range of scientific and technology services, specifically providing temporary use of online non‑downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for healthcare management, including patient care reports, appointment scheduling, electronic health records, inventory management, compliance, insurance claims, staff scheduling, billing, financial reporting, and related analytics. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same field of AI‑driven healthcare software services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific services listed. No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The last status event was the abandonment notice on February 21 2026. If you are thinking of using a similar name for AI‑based healthcare software, this history suggests a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.