Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for APPLE, serial 99129182, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
APPLESerial 99129182 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: 8AO 8AO Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 09, 2025
The record shows that the mark “APPLE” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is 8AO 8AO Ltd., a corporation organized in Hong Kong, and the mark was filed on April 9, 2025 under an intent‑to‑use basis. The goods and services covered are extensive, ranging from computer game programs and downloadable video game software to paper goods such as printed calendars, trading cards, and stationery, as well as clothing items like T‑shirts and costumes for role‑playing games. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed categories. The record does not grant control over every use of the word “APPLE.” The prosecution history shows a protest and a non‑final action, but the abandonment event on January 2, 2026 is the latest meaningful status. No enforcement actions or oppositions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark no longer protects the owner, but the extensive goods list still signals a potential concern if the new use falls within those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.