Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG NATURAL, serial 99136519, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNG NATURALSerial 99136519 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Joohyung Lee
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Apr 14, 2025
The record shows that “SAMSUNG NATURAL” is a pending application on the Principal Register, owned by Joohyung Lee. The mark covers cosmetics and cleaning products such as natural and organic cosmetics, anti‑aging moisturizers, herbal extracts used in cosmetics, and hair shampoos and conditioners, as well as staple foods like ginseng candy, ginseng tea, and processed ginseng used as an herb, spice or flavoring. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these two classes—cosmetics and ginseng‑based foods—because the goods listed are the exact scope the record protects. This record does not give control over every use of the words “Samsung” or “Natural” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a final refusal in early April 2026, followed by approval for publication on July 20, 2026, and publication for opposition on August 18, 2026, the most recent status event. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that use in cosmetics or ginseng foods could be viewed as infringing the pending mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.