Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for “TUCK IT FIT” ADJUSTABLE-HEM WOMEN’S TOP WITH INTEGRATED CINCHING MECHANISM THE PRESENT INVENTION RELATES TO WOMEN’S APPAREL, AND MORE PARTICULARLY TO A GARMENT CONSTRUCTION FOR A WOMEN’S TOP HAVING AN INTEGRATED ADJUSTABLE CINCH, BANDING, TIE, OR DRAW-STRING AT THE BOTTOM HEM THAT GATHERS FABRIC (E.G., VIA TIE, RUCHE, ELASTIC) TO CONCEAL THE LOWER ABDOMINAL AREA AND ACHIEVE A CUSTOMIZABLE FIT. THE “TUCK IT FIT” TOP INTEGRATES A CONTINUOUS CHANNEL AT THE BOTTOM HEM, THROUGH WHICH AN ADJUSTABLE CINCHING ELEMENT (DRAW-STRING, ELASTIC CORD, OR RIBBON) IS THREADED. BY PULLING AND TYING THE ENDS OF THIS ELEMENT, THE WEARER CAN GATHER (RUCHE) THE HEM TO A DESIRED TIGHTNESS, THEREBY CONCEALING THE WEARER’S LOWER BELLY, CREATING CUSTOMIZABLE BLOUSING OR DRAPING ABOVE THE WAIST, PROVIDING SUPPORT AND GENTLE SHAPING, AND OFFERING A CLEAN, MINIMAL EXTERIOR APPEARANCE WHEN RELEASED OR FITTED.THIS “TUCK IT FIT” INVENTION THUS OFFERS AN ELEGANT, FUNCTIONAL SOLUTION FOR WOMEN SEEKING BOTH STYLE FLEXIBILITY AND CONFIDENT CONCEALMENT OF THE LOWER ABDOMINAL REGION., serial 99157038, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 99157038 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Kerry L Armstead
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Apr 26, 2025
The record shows that the mark “TUCK IT FIT” is dead and was refused because the application did not meet minimum filing date requirements. The owner listed is Kerry L Armstead, an individual. The goods covered are women’s tops, specifically camis. A similar name would raise the closest concern for apparel in the women’s tops category, especially garments with adjustable hems or cinching features. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific goods listed. The prosecution history shows only the initial filing and receipt; no further examination or amendment occurred. The latest status event is the refusal on June 12, 2025. No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful concern in the women’s tops market, but it does not indicate that the owner has actively protected or enforced the mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.