Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROBERT PAUL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, serial 99170605, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROBERT PAUL CAPITAL MANAGEMENTSerial 99170605 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Paul D. Jaskulski Jr.
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed May 05, 2025
The record shows that “ROBERT PAUL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT” is an abandoned service mark; the application was filed by Paul D. Jaskulski Jr. on May 5 2025 and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice on Jan 12 2026 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action, so the mark never entered registration. The only goods and services listed are “Financial planning and investment advisory services; Investment services, namely, asset acquisition, consultation, development and management services” in International Class 036, so a similar name used in the same financial‑planning or investment‑advisory context would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Robert Paul” or “Capital Management” in unrelated fields. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the latest status event is the Jan 12 2026 abandonment. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable financial‑planning services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.