Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOWER, serial 99194573, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOWERSerial 99194573 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Flower Labs GmbH
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 20, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark FLOWER owned by Flower Labs GmbH, filed on May 20, 2025 and currently under examination on the Principal Register; the most recent status event is a non‑final Office action dated September 3, 2026. The application covers a range of tech‑focused services, chiefly in Class 009 (downloadable AI‑related data sets, machine‑learning training files and computer documentation), Class 035 (updating memory banks in computer databases), Class 037 (hardware repair and IT consultancy), Class 038 (electronic transmission of data from AI/ML databases) and several education and software‑development classes. A similar name would raise the closest concern where the goods or services overlap with these AI‑data, software‑training or electronic‑communication offerings; it does not automatically extend to unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows only the usual examination steps and a recent non‑final action, with no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement signals appearing. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if your product or service falls within the same AI‑data or software‑related categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.