Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JAGUAR, serial 99202867, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JAGUARSerial 99202867 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED
Class 001 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 006 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 022 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed May 27, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark JAGUAR filed by JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED, a UK limited‑liability company, and it is currently under examination on the Principal Register. The goods and services span dozens of classes but are centered on automotive‑related items such as motor vehicles, parts, fluids, cleaning preparations, electronic driving‑assist systems, vehicle‑customization, maintenance, insurance, retail services, and related apparel and accessories; a similar name used for anything in that automotive sphere would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “JAGUAR,” especially in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a series of office actions, with the most recent non‑final action emailed on August 6 2026, indicating the USPTO is still requesting a response. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that touches automotive products or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.