Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOR DE ALBARIÑO, serial 99205807, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOR DE ALBARIÑOSerial 99205807 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: BODEGAS MARQUES DE VIZHOJA, S.A.
Class 033 -
Filed May 28, 2025
The record shows that the application for FLOR DE ALBARIÑO was filed by BODEGAS MARQUES DE VIZHOJA, S.A., a Spanish sociedad anónima, but it is now dead after being abandoned on May 20, 2026 because the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal. The only goods listed are “Wine” in International Class 033, so a similar name used for wine or closely related alcoholic beverages would present the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “FLOR DE ALBARIÑO” in any product or service. The prosecution history shows a final refusal in February 2026 followed by an abandonment notice in May 2026, confirming the application never reached registration. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand wine under a similar name, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO found a conflict in that sector.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.