Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GEOGRAPHY OWNER, serial 99219684, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GEOGRAPHY OWNERSerial 99219684 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Velatura Public Benefit Corporation
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 05, 2025
The record shows that “GEOGRAPHY OWNER” is not a live mark – it was abandoned on September 7 2026 because the applicant never filed a Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice that day. The owner listed in the file is Velatura Public Benefit Corporation, a Delaware benefit corporation. The application covered services in class 035 (collection, compilation and organization of medical‑ and health‑related data in computer databases), class 038 (electronic exchange of medical records across a health‑information network) and class 042 (software‑as‑a‑service platforms using AI for health information communication, data management and electronic data collection). A similar name would raise the closest concern for any business offering comparable health‑data or medical‑record services, but the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Geography Owner” in unrelated fields. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on September 7 2026, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a health‑data or medical‑records service under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.