Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AZTEC BURN, FIRE-FLOWER BREW, MIEL DE SOL, (HONEY OF THE SUN), XOCOLATL HEAT, CAFE QUETZAL FIREHONEY-BASED SYRUP USED AS A FLAVORING FOR COFFEE AND BEVERAGES; CACAO-BASED COFFEE FLAVORING SYRUP; SPICED HONEY ADDITIVE FOR BEVERAGES, serial 99230587, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AZTEC BURN, FIRE-FLOWER BREW, MIEL DE SOL, (HONEY OF THE SUN), XOCOLATL HEAT, CAFE QUETZAL FIREHONEY-BASED SYRUP USED AS A FLAVORING FOR COFFEE AND BEVERAGES; CACAO-BASED COFFEE FLAVORING SYRUP; SPICED HONEY ADDITIVE FOR BEVERAGESSerial 99230587 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Clay C Smith
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Jun 12, 2025
The record shows that the application for “AZTEC BURN, FIRE‑FLOWER BREW, MIEL DE SOL, (HONEY OF THE SUN), XOCOLATL HEAT, CAFE QUETZAL FIREHONEY‑BASED SYRUP USED AS A FLAVORING FOR COFFEE AND BEVERAGES; CACAO‑BASED COFFEE FLAVORING SYRUP; SPICED HONEY ADDITIVE FOR BEVERAGES” was filed on June 12, 2025 by Clay C Smith, an individual, on an intent‑to‑use basis. The application was later declared dead because it did not meet minimum filing date requirements, and the serial number was assigned in error. The mark was never registered and remains inactive. The goods listed are syrup for flavoring food or beverages, specifically coffee and beverage flavorings. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same category of flavored syrups for beverages. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful concern in flavored beverage syrups, but it does not indicate a broader claim.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.