Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY AIVATAR, serial 99244090, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY AIVATARSerial 99244090 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 20, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for “M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY AIVATAR” owned by Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC, a Connecticut limited‑liability company, and it is being examined on the Principal Register. The goods and services span Class 009 (downloadable mobile apps, computer hardware and software that use AI for music creation, licensing, royalty identification and collection), Class 036 (collecting license fees and paying copyright owners), Class 042 (AI‑as‑a‑service and subscription‑based online software for the same music‑related functions) and Class 045 (music, intellectual‑property and copyright licensing services). A similar name used in any of those technology‑focused music‑creation or licensing contexts would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those areas are farther from the listed scope. The latest event is a final refusal mailed on July 22 2026, indicating the USPTO has not approved the mark; no enforcement actions appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that overlaps the AI‑driven music‑licensing space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.