Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY PAST PORTAL NIL SECURITIES | RIGHTS OF BUSINESS PROTECTIONS, serial 99244619, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY PAST PORTAL NIL SECURITIES | RIGHTS OF BUSINESS PROTECTIONSSerial 99244619 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 20, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application on the Principal Register owned by Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC, and the USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance on May 5 2026, meaning the applicant must file a Statement of Use or request an extension within six months of that date. The goods and services are focused on class 009 software and hardware for AI‑driven music creation, licensing and royalty collection; class 036 collection of license fees for independent writers and publishers; class 042 AI‑as‑a‑service and subscription‑based online software for the same music‑related functions; and class 045 music‑licensing and copyright‑licensing services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these technology‑driven music and licensing areas, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “MAIN PLAY” or the other descriptive elements. The prosecution history shows an examiner’s amendment on February 17 2025 that led to approval for publication on the Principal Register, but the mark never entered the Supplemental Register. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer AI‑based music creation or licensing services under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.