Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY IPC@ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATIVE ADDRESS, serial 99244622, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY IPC@ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATIVE ADDRESSSerial 99244622 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 20, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application on the Principal Register owned by Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC, and the USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance on May 5 2026, meaning the applicant must file a Statement of Use or request an extension within six months. The goods and services listed span Class 009 (downloadable mobile apps, computer hardware and software for AI‑driven music creation, licensing and royalty collection), Class 036 (collecting license fees and paying copyright owners), Class 042 (AI‑as‑a‑service and subscription‑based online software for the same music‑related functions) and Class 045 (music‑licensing, intellectual‑property licensing and copyright‑licensing agency services). A similar name would raise the closest concern in these technology‑driven music‑creation and licensing contexts, but the record does not extend control to unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows an examiner’s amendment on February 17 2025 that led to approval for publication on the Principal Register, but it never entered the Supplemental Register. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that will be used for AI‑based music software or licensing services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.