Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY FAIDAR FORENSIC AI DETECTION AND RECOGNITION, serial 99244711, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY FAIDAR FORENSIC AI DETECTION AND RECOGNITIONSerial 99244711 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 20, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for “M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGY FAIDAR FORENSIC AI DETECTION AND RECOGNITION” owned by Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC, filed on June 20 2025 and currently on the Principal Register after an examiner’s amendment; a Notice of Allowance was issued on May 5 2026, so the applicant must file a Statement of Use or request an extension within six months. The goods and services listed span Class 009 (AI‑driven music‑creation software and related hardware), Class 036 (collecting license fees for independent writers and publishers), Class 042 (AI‑as‑a‑service and subscription cloud software for music licensing and royalty functions) and Class 045 (music‑licensing and copyright‑licensing services). A similar name used in these music‑technology, licensing or royalty‑collection contexts would raise the closest record‑based concern, but the filing does not give the owner control over every unrelated use of the words. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer AI‑based music‑creation or licensing services under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.