Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for M.A.I.N. PLAY MUSICIANS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NETWORK YOUR RIGHT TO KEEPING AI TOOLBASED M. M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC, serial 99244721, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
M.A.I.N. PLAY MUSICIANS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NETWORK YOUR RIGHT TO KEEPING AI TOOLBASED M. M.A.I.N. PLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLCSerial 99244721 · Principal Register
Pending · Published for Opposition
Owner: Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 20, 2025
The record is live and currently pending — the USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance on May 5 2026 and the applicant, Gerald Isaac Music Group, Management and Services LLC, must file a Statement of Use or request an extension within six months. The mark covers downloadable mobile apps, computer hardware and software that use artificial intelligence for music creation, licensing, copyright and royalty services (class 009); collection of license fees for independent writers and publishers (class 036); AI‑as‑a‑service and subscription‑based online software for the same music‑related functions (class 042); and music, intellectual‑property and copyright licensing services (class 045). A similar name would raise the closest concern in these technology‑driven music‑creation and licensing areas, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows an examiner’s amendment on February 17 2025 that led to approval for publication on the Principal Register, but it remains a pending application. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer AI‑powered music tools or licensing services under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.